Question of the Week
At the recent Republican debate, the candidates were asked to raise their hands if they did not believe in evolution. Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, and Tom Tancredo all raised their hands.
And this is America, where people are free to believe anything they like. But these are people who are running to be the president of the most powerful nation on earth. The next president must be able to lead the world in dealing with the crisis of global climate change. The next president will probably have to revisit stem cell research. The next president will possibly have to deal with another epidemic. All of these things are difficult to do when you don’t believe in science. Just ask President Bush.
But these three guys raise their hands, and it’s buried in the middle of the story, after we finish talking about the legacy of Ronald Reagan. Why is this not the top story? If they had said they were athiests, it would be the top story. If they had said they were atheists, that would be the end of their careers in American politics. If they had said they were agnostic, that would be the end of their careers in American politics.
So many of our most celebrated figures are openly athiest, from scientists to artists, from business leaders to Karl Rove. But not one of the candidates running for president.
Why is disbelief in evolution more acceptable in American politics today than disbelief in God?
May 7th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Because fundamentalist evangelicals are far more confrontational and judgemental as a political voting block then atheists who are generally well-reasoned (I tend to think an appreciation and gift for reason are prerequisites for atheism – correct me if I’m wrong). They are also more organized politically. You should do something about that, dude. Seriously. And by the way – if you want to know what you’re really up against – go see JESUS CAMP toute suite. Children under 10 years old being indoctrinated to cheer and pray through tears (and sometimes in tongues) for “righteous judges” who follow their strict interpretation of “God’s law” (i.e. abolition of teaching evolution in schools and as always, a right to reproductive choice) is a formidable foe.